What the 2022 model year data actually says about the two most argued-about SUVs in America.
There is no rivalry in the American automotive world quite like Jeep versus Bronco. It’s older than most of the people arguing about it, it was dormant for twenty-four years, and it came roaring back the moment Ford put the Bronco back into production in 2021. Walk into any trailhead parking lot, any off-road forum, any comment section under a video of somebody fording a creek, and you’ll find the same argument being relitigated with the intensity of a constitutional debate.
And almost none of it is about data.
The argument is about heritage, about solid front axles, about removable doors, about whether the Bronco is a “real” off-roader or a Ranger in a costume, about whether the Wrangler has been coasting on its badge since the Clinton administration. These are fun arguments. They are also arguments about identity, which means nobody ever wins them.
We’re going to look at the 2022 models and compare where they come out. Five years of road history gives us plenty of data to work with.
Two indexes do most of the work here:
These are not the same thing, and conflating them is where most reliability commentary goes off the rails. A vehicle can be in the shop constantly for cheap items and still score well on severity. Another can go years without trouble and then hand you a five-figure bill. The rank combines both — which is why a rank won’t always track either score on its own.
The 2022 Wrangler lands at #26 out of 37 in its class. Below average. Not catastrophic, not good. Underneath that rank: a Fix Frequency of 1.28 — it needs repairs about 28% more often than typical — against a Fix Severity of 1.04, meaning the bills themselves are essentially normal.
That’s a coherent story. The Wrangler is not an expensive vehicle to fix. It is a frequent one. On the class scatter it sits just barely right of the vertical average line and just above the horizontal one, in a neighborhood with the Bronco Sport, the Escape, and the gas Tucson, while the Sportage, CX-5, Forester, and Equinox sit comfortably to the left. 146,452 sold — this is not a small sample or an obscure trim.
Break the 2022 Wrangler’s repairs down by system and the picture is lopsided. 5 of its 10 reported categories come in below the class average — engine, exterior and lighting, interior and safety, braking, structure and body. Genuinely good. Three more sit only mildly elevated.
But Steering & Suspension sits at 5.97× the class average.
Six times. That is not a rounding error or a noisy category. That is a single system dragging an entire vehicle’s rank down while everything around it behaves. Tires and wheels come in elevated too, around 1.52×, which is the sort of thing you’d expect to travel alongside a steering issue rather than independently of it.
That’s actually useful information. A vehicle with mediocre scores spread evenly across every subsystem is just built loosely — there’s nothing to fix. A vehicle with one screaming category and the rest in line has a defect, and defects can be inspected for, budgeted for, and negotiated over.
Across all 22 model years of the Wrangler, 2022 is unremarkable — slightly above the class average line, in the same range as 2019, 2020, and 2013.
That is not a bad year. That is an outlier. The rank confirms it: the Wrangler falls to #44 of 44 for 2024 — dead last in its class, its worst position in two decades. Then 2025 snaps back to 2.21 — still above the class line, but a fraction of the prior year — with the rank recovering to #32.
So the honest summary: the 2022 is mediocre, the 2024 is the one to avoid at nearly any price, and 2025 looks like a correction in progress. The long-term standing across all 22 model years — #58 of 65 — reflects a lot of history, and should not be read as a verdict on any single year.
The 2022 Bronco lands at #49 out of 59, flagged well below average. Fix Frequency 2.04 — it needs fixing roughly twice as often as typical for its class — with Fix Severity at 0.97, the repairs being, if anything, slightly cheaper than average.
A harsher version of the same story. On the class scatter it sits right of the vertical line and just below the horizontal one, out past the Pathfinder and near the Outlander and Model Y, while the RAV4 hybrid, Murano, Macan, and CX-9 occupy the safe lower-left. 96,548 sold — again, mainstream volume.
This is the most important contrast in the whole comparison, and it’s the one nobody makes. The 2022 Bronco doesn’t have one bad system. It has 9.
Exterior and lighting runs about 3.6× the class average. Engine, 2.69×. Steering and suspension, 2.56×. Braking, 2.55×. Powertrain, 2.12×. Interior and safety, structure and body, unclassified, electrical — all above average. Only tires/wheels and other equipment come in below the class line.
That is not a defect. That is a launch.
And it reads exactly like one. The Bronco returned for 2021 after a twenty-four-year absence, on a new platform, in a new plant, during a semiconductor shortage. The 2021 model year posts a 3.90 combined score — the worst in the model’s short life. 2022 improves to 3.00, still above the class norm of 2.00. Then 2023 drops to 1.70, below the line. 2024 hits 1.37, the model’s best. 2025 holds at 1.41.
The Bronco’s rank trend is one of the cleanest improvement curves in this data: #50 → #49 → #37 → #21 → #15 from 2021 through 2025. Four consecutive years of gains, no reversals.
For the 2022 model year, the Wrangler is the better bet — but not for the reasons the Jeep faithful will tell you.
The Wrangler wins 2022 because its problems are concentrated. One system is badly out of line; most of the rest of the vehicle is at or better than class. Inspect that system carefully, or budget for it, and you’re buying a vehicle whose remaining subsystems are broadly fine.
The Bronco loses 2022 because its problems are diffuse. When 9 of 11 categories run hot, there’s no single thing to inspect for — you’re buying the aggregate looseness of an early production run, and that’s much harder to price.
But the trend lines point in opposite directions. The Bronco has climbed hard for four straight years. The Wrangler held steady through 2022, then fell off a cliff in 2024. If someone read “Wrangler beats Bronco” and walked onto a lot to buy a 2024 Wrangler over a 2024 Bronco, the data says they got it exactly backwards — for 2024, the Bronco posts its best year on record (1.37) and the Wrangler posts its worst in twenty years (12.82).
The comparison isn’t Wrangler versus Bronco. It’s always a specific year versus a specific year. The Wrangler’s own scores swing from under 2.00 to 12.82 depending on which one you’re standing in front of. That’s a factor of six or more, inside one model, on one dealership lot.
Most people encounter this information as a headline. “Most reliable SUVs.” “Avoid these models.” Those headlines are averages of averages, usually across an entire nameplate’s history — and they wash out the only variable that matters when you’re standing in front of a used vehicle with a price on the windshield.
You’re not buying a nameplate. You’re buying one model year, of one drivetrain, in one class. That’s the resolution the decision happens at, and it should be the resolution the data comes at.
EVERY CHART ABOVE IS A LIVE VIEW
The year-by-year scores, the component fingerprints, the class scatter plots, the rank trends — for any vehicle, against every competitor in its class. Tap a year, see it. Tap a competitor’s bubble, switch to it. Find the best year and the year to avoid before you make an offer, not after.
The trial unlocks the full analysis on every model year — not the summary, not the nameplate average, but the year-by-year breakdown that tells you a 2022 Wrangler and a 2024 Wrangler are, for reliability purposes, two different vehicles wearing the same badge.
The 2022 Jeep Wrangler ranks #26 of 37 with a nearly normal repair cost and one badly misbehaving system. The 2022 Ford Bronco ranks #49 of 59 with equally normal repair costs and 9 systems running hot — the signature of a nameplate restart. On the 2022 model year alone, the Wrangler is the better buy.
Change the year and you can flip that conclusion entirely. That’s not a weakness in the data. That’s the finding.
The tribal version of this argument will keep going regardless — it always does, and honestly it should, because it’s fun. But if the question is which one is going to be in the shop, the answer was never “Jeep” or “Ford.” It was always a four-digit number on the title.
Figures are drawn from NHTSA-reported issues normalised against US sales volumes and benchmarked within class and model year. Gas models unless stated; the Wrangler 4xe plug-in hybrid is scored separately and does not share these numbers. Data generated 2026-08-03.
EXPLORE THE DATA
The dashboard behind this analysis lets you filter by make, model, year, and component. Try the free sample or unlock the full dataset.